From: | Christopher Browne <cbbrowne(at)acm(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Ammunition |
Date: | 2003-08-14 00:14:52 |
Message-ID: | 60d6f9nlhf.fsf@dev6.int.libertyrms.info |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-advocacy |
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us (Bruce Momjian) writes:
> To me, the big MySQL issue is that it isn't an open source
> development project, just a company that distributes code via open
> source. They will never be able to keep up with us.
I found the quote from Scott McNealy most ironic:
http://www.computerworld.com/hardwaretopics/hardware/story/0,10801,78443,00.html
"If you want to save...money, make the default database MySQL. It's
free, it's bundled [with Sun's Solaris software], you've got the whole
open-source community working on making it better. If Yahoo and Google
can run their entire operations on MySQL, then certainly there's a
huge chunk of your operations that could run on it as well."
There lies a good question...
How many "open source" developers are _actually_ working on MySQL?
If Scott McNealy is right, then who are those scads of people
committing code to the tree? :-)
--
"cbbrowne","@","acm.org"
http://cbbrowne.com/info/linux.html
"There are no threads in a.b.p.erotica, so there's no gain in using a
threaded news reader." -- (Unknown source)
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | acc | 2003-08-14 00:28:56 | Re: Ammunition / store.pgsql.com |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2003-08-13 23:50:53 | Re: Ammunition |