Re: BUG #2600: dblink compile with SSL missing libraries

tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us (Tom Lane) writes:
> Chris Browne <cbbrowne(at)acm(dot)org> writes:
>> I still need the following, on AIX:
>
>> -SHLIB_LINK = $(libpq)
>> +SHLIB_LINK = $(libpq) $(LIBS)
>
> No you don't --- see recent warthog complaint. We have to filter LIBS
> down to just the minimum.

I'm at a loss, then.

- If LIBS is being filtered to the minimum, then shouldn't it be
appropriate to add it in here?

- There isn't any variable other than LIBS that *does* get bound to
include -lssl and -lcrypto

- Do we need to add an additional LIBSSL, spattered widely through
makefiles, which sometimes gets linked in?

- Or do we need some custom DBLINKLIBS, defined in configure, that is
only used for dblink?
--
(reverse (concatenate 'string "moc.enworbbc" "@" "enworbbc"))
http://www3.sympatico.ca/cbbrowne/languages.html
QT adds to a Linux distribution a level of licencing complexity that
nullifies one of the major virtues of Linux: no licencing complexity.
-- <jedi(at)dementia(dot)mishnet>