Re: Fastest Backup & Restore for perf testing

From: Steve Atkins <steve(at)blighty(dot)com>
To: "pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Cc: "Wes Vaske (wvaske)" <wvaske(at)micron(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Fastest Backup & Restore for perf testing
Date: 2015-05-27 20:39:06
Message-ID: 60ED9885-1F66-4BD0-9DE7-8CCCB7D0D75E@blighty.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance


> On May 27, 2015, at 1:24 PM, Wes Vaske (wvaske) <wvaske(at)micron(dot)com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I’m running performance tests against a PostgreSQL database (9.4) with various hardware configurations and a couple different benchmarks (TPC-C & TPC-H).
>
> I’m currently using pg_dump and pg_restore to refresh my dataset between runs but this process seems slower than it could be.
>
> Is it possible to do a tar/untar of the entire /var/lib/pgsql tree as a backup & restore method?
>
> If not, is there another way to restore a dataset more quickly? The database is dedicated to the test dataset so trashing & rebuilding the entire application/OS/anything is no issue for me—there’s no data for me to lose.
>

Dropping the database and recreating it from a template database with "create database foo template foo_template" is about as fast as a file copy, much faster than pg_restore tends to be.

Cheers,
Steve

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Josh Berkus 2015-05-27 22:02:28 Re: ERROR: missing chunk number 0 for toast value 1821556134 in pg_toast_17881
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2015-05-27 20:37:01 Re: Fastest Backup & Restore for perf testing