Re: Naming of gss_accept_deleg

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Abhijit Menon-Sen <ams(at)toroid(dot)org>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Naming of gss_accept_deleg
Date: 2023-05-22 15:08:16
Message-ID: 609844.1684768096@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Abhijit Menon-Sen <ams(at)toroid(dot)org> writes:
> Here's the diff, but the 0/1 values of settings like sslsni and
> sslcompression don't seem to be validated anywhere, unlike the string
> options in connectOptions2, so I didn't do anything for gssdelegation.

Thanks! I'll set to work on this. I assume we want to squeeze
it into beta1, so there's not much time.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tristan Partin 2023-05-22 15:10:31 Add missing includes
Previous Message Abhijit Menon-Sen 2023-05-22 15:03:34 Re: Naming of gss_accept_deleg