Re: [HACKERS] posmaster failed under high load

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Oleg Bartunov <oleg(at)sai(dot)msu(dot)su>
Cc: hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] posmaster failed under high load
Date: 1999-05-05 23:09:43
Message-ID: 6083.925945783@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Oleg Bartunov <oleg(at)sai(dot)msu(dot)su> writes:
> It's interesting, that process with pid 701 migrates from
> (postmaster) to postgres with normal ps output !

Yes, that's pretty strong evidence in favor of my theory (that these
processes are just new backends that haven't received a command yet).

I'm surprised that it takes so long for your test clients to issue their
first commands --- is the test load *that* high, or do you have a
deliberate delay in there?

regards, tom lane

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 1999-05-05 23:32:25 Re: [HACKERS] Problem with function indexing
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 1999-05-05 21:36:44 Re: [HACKERS] new patches