| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Artur Zakirov <a(dot)zakirov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Jim Nasby <Jim(dot)Nasby(at)bluetreble(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: plpgsql - DECLARE - cannot to use %TYPE or %ROWTYPE for composite types |
| Date: | 2016-03-14 21:57:16 |
| Message-ID: | 6066.1457992636@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> Where you are expecting the implementation? In PLpgSQL only, or generally
> in DDL, or in both levels?
I'd envision this as something the main parser does and plpgsql piggybacks
on. One of the many half-baked things about %TYPE is that the main parser
has an implementation, and plpgsql has its own not-entirely-compatible
one. (And one thing I especially don't like about the submitted patch is
that it makes those two diverge even further.)
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2016-03-14 22:06:26 | Re: Fix for OpenSSL error queue bug |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2016-03-14 21:57:09 | Re: Background Processes and reporting |