Re: pl/perl extension fails on Windows

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(dot)dunstan(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Sandeep Thakkar <sandeep(dot)thakkar(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pl/perl extension fails on Windows
Date: 2017-07-12 18:31:47
Message-ID: 6063dd4c-cd1e-d9d8-fa0d-3bddb1403c66@2ndQuadrant.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 07/12/2017 11:49 AM, Dave Page wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 4:35 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us
> <mailto:tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>> wrote:
>
> Sandeep Thakkar <sandeep(dot)thakkar(at)enterprisedb(dot)com
> <mailto:sandeep(dot)thakkar(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>> writes:
> > I compiled PG 10 beta1/beta2 with "--with-perl" option on
> Windows and the
> > extension crashes the database.
> > *src/pl/plperl/Util.c: loadable library and perl binaries are
> mismatched
> > (got handshake key 0A900080, needed 0AC80080)*
>
> > This is seen with Perl 5.24 but not with 5.20, 5.16. What I
> found is that
> > the handshake function is added in Perl 5.21.x and probably that
> is why we
> > don't see this issue in earlier versions.
>
> Well, we have various buildfarm machines running perls newer than
> that,
> eg, crake, with 5.24.1. So I'd say there is something busted
> about your
> perl installation. Perhaps leftover bits of an older version
> somewhere?
>
>
> Well crake is a Fedora box - and we have no problems on Linux, only on
> Windows.
>
>

Yeah, I have this on one of my Windows boxes, and haven't had time to
get to the bottom of it yet ;-(

Latest versions of ActivePerl don't ship with library descriptor files,
either, which is unpleasant.

cheers

andrew

--
Andrew Dunstan https://www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David Fetter 2017-07-12 18:48:02 Re: idea: custom log_line_prefix components besides application_name
Previous Message Jeff Janes 2017-07-12 17:50:21 Re: why not parallel seq scan for slow functions