From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(dot)dunstan(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Sandeep Thakkar <sandeep(dot)thakkar(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: pl/perl extension fails on Windows |
Date: | 2017-07-12 18:31:47 |
Message-ID: | 6063dd4c-cd1e-d9d8-fa0d-3bddb1403c66@2ndQuadrant.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 07/12/2017 11:49 AM, Dave Page wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 4:35 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us
> <mailto:tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>> wrote:
>
> Sandeep Thakkar <sandeep(dot)thakkar(at)enterprisedb(dot)com
> <mailto:sandeep(dot)thakkar(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>> writes:
> > I compiled PG 10 beta1/beta2 with "--with-perl" option on
> Windows and the
> > extension crashes the database.
> > *src/pl/plperl/Util.c: loadable library and perl binaries are
> mismatched
> > (got handshake key 0A900080, needed 0AC80080)*
>
> > This is seen with Perl 5.24 but not with 5.20, 5.16. What I
> found is that
> > the handshake function is added in Perl 5.21.x and probably that
> is why we
> > don't see this issue in earlier versions.
>
> Well, we have various buildfarm machines running perls newer than
> that,
> eg, crake, with 5.24.1. So I'd say there is something busted
> about your
> perl installation. Perhaps leftover bits of an older version
> somewhere?
>
>
> Well crake is a Fedora box - and we have no problems on Linux, only on
> Windows.
>
>
Yeah, I have this on one of my Windows boxes, and haven't had time to
get to the bottom of it yet ;-(
Latest versions of ActivePerl don't ship with library descriptor files,
either, which is unpleasant.
cheers
andrew
--
Andrew Dunstan https://www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | David Fetter | 2017-07-12 18:48:02 | Re: idea: custom log_line_prefix components besides application_name |
Previous Message | Jeff Janes | 2017-07-12 17:50:21 | Re: why not parallel seq scan for slow functions |