From: | Chris Browne <cbbrowne(at)acm(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Partitioned tables & Slony |
Date: | 2007-12-18 16:17:01 |
Message-ID: | 604peg6kqq.fsf@dba2.int.libertyrms.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Goboxe <hadzramin(dot)ar(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> What need to be taken care of when replicating data from partitioned
> tables?
>
> I have several master tables that are inherited by date either daily,
> weekly and monthly.
>
> How to automate addition of newly created child tables into Slony
> cluster?
There's an outline of how to do it, in the partitioning test...
http://main.slony.info/viewcvs/viewvc.cgi/slony1-engine/tests/testpartition/
--
"cbbrowne","@","linuxdatabases.info"
http://linuxfinances.info/info/slony.html
"If we believe in data structures, we must believe in independent
(hence simultaneous) processing. For why else would we collect items
within a structure? Why do we tolerate languages that give us the one
without the other?" -- Alan J. Perlis
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Weber, Geoffrey M. | 2007-12-18 16:28:42 | Re: Problem with index not being chosen inside PL/PgSQL function... |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2007-12-18 16:11:12 | Re: Problem with index not being chosen inside PL/PgSQL function... |