Re: machine-readable pg_controldata?

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: RIPEMD160

> (FWIW, my recollection of the original design intention for
> pg_controldata was that it was meant as a troubleshooting tool if the
> database wouldn't start up. I'm somewhat bemused to hear that people
> are trying to use it as part of production scripts. It wasn't meant to
> produce machine-readable output, much less to give values that you could
> rely on with respect to a running server.)

I mostly use it to check on the progress of a PITR slave: just curious,
is there a better/preferred way to get that information?

- --
Greg Sabino Mullane greg(at)turnstep(dot)com
PGP Key: 0x14964AC8 201003091016
http://biglumber.com/x/web?pk=2529DF6AB8F79407E94445B4BC9B906714964AC8
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iEYEAREDAAYFAkuWZnAACgkQvJuQZxSWSsiqWgCglhHZ/awR5lSkjPG+yzd05ulz
X6AAn0uvraweuz8pG15OybCyMzgfH3XX
=QI2N
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----