Re: Bug? 'psql -l' in pg_ctl?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: GH <grasshacker(at)over-yonder(dot)net>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Bug? 'psql -l' in pg_ctl?
Date: 2000-11-27 03:00:49
Message-ID: 6047.975294049@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
> Personally, I don't trust pg_ctl farther than I can throw it. Consider
> not using it.

That's a tad harsh, considering that the bug under discussion is
psql's not pg_ctl's ;-)

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2000-11-27 03:24:28 Re: Bug? 'psql -l' in pg_ctl?
Previous Message Tom Lane 2000-11-27 03:00:38 Re: Bug? 'psql -l' in pg_ctl?