From: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
Cc: | "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Changing recovery.conf parameters into GUCs |
Date: | 2013-07-08 20:54:39 |
Message-ID: | 6046DCBE-145B-49A2-B3D8-BB92E4A4BB32@gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2013/07/09, at 4:09, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> wrote:
> On 07/05/2013 10:09 PM, Michael Paquier wrote:
>> Yeah, it would be good to revive this thread now, which is the
>> beginning of the development cycle. As of now, just to recall
>> everybody, an agreement on this patch still needs to be found... Simon
>> is concerned with backward compatibility. Greg presented a nice spec
>> some time ago (Robert and I liked it) which would break backward
>> compatibility but allow to begin with a fresh infrastructure.
>
> As folks know, I favor Smith's approach. However, as far as I can find,
> GSmith never posted a patch for his version.
Actually I did.
http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAB7nPqR+fpopEDMoecK+AfZB5a8kUUvxpU=1a2JiX5d9s=0s6Q@mail.gmail.com
--
Michael
(Sent from my mobile phone)
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jeff Janes | 2013-07-08 20:59:12 | pageinspect documentation for 9.3 |
Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2013-07-08 20:38:00 | Re: preserving forensic information when we freeze |