Re: Loss of boldface on syntax synopsis, v10 & devel

From: "Greg Sabino Mullane" <greg(at)turnstep(dot)com>
To: pgsql-www(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Loss of boldface on syntax synopsis, v10 & devel
Date: 2018-05-16 13:08:30
Message-ID: 603f47f49aeae9c53adf153cfac30a5b@biglumber.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-www


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: RIPEMD160

Peter Eisentraut said re the v10 doc changes:

> They are meant to be italic only. I believe making replaceable text
> italic is a wide-spread convention.

Convention or not, the new way looks (IMHO) much worse, as the keywords
really blend in with the rest of the page. The older docs have a sharp,
clear distinction that looks more professional. Compare:

https://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.6/static/sql-altertable.html

https://www.postgresql.org/docs/10/static/sql-altertable.html

- --
Greg Sabino Mullane greg(at)turnstep(dot)com
PGP Key: 0x14964AC8 201805160906
http://biglumber.com/x/web?pk=2529DF6AB8F79407E94445B4BC9B906714964AC8

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iEYEAREDAAYFAlr8LS4ACgkQvJuQZxSWSsh0swCff2T6OXtWI9JT3IoqGHghYkLl
lNUAoL/NAxwKqUmE8Gnr5nSZmQwgLaiP
=s3/O
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2018-05-16 13:44:32 Re: NaNs in numeric_power (was Re: Postgres 11 release notes)
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2018-05-16 11:59:23 Re: Postgres 11 release notes