From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
Cc: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: 9.0 release notes done |
Date: | 2010-03-22 00:41:23 |
Message-ID: | 603c8f071003211741j69a546ds327911633d37507e@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sun, Mar 21, 2010 at 6:14 PM, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
> bruce wrote:
>> Josh Berkus wrote:
>> > On 3/19/10 9:02 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>> > > I have completed the 9.0 release notes:
>> > >
>> > > http://developer.postgresql.org/pgdocs/postgres/release-9-0.html
>> > >
>> > > I kept the 9.0-alpha release notes in the SGML because people might want
>> > > to compare them with the release notes I did, and because the
>> > > introductory text will be needed for the next alpha. Eventually we will
>> > > want to trim the alpha SGML and perhaps place it in a large comment
>> > > block for use for 9.1 alphas.
>> >
>> > I'm going to paste these into the wiki so that I can edit them for
>> > language and style.
>>
>> I am unclear how you expect to merge this back into SGML from a wiki.
>> Also consider the SGML will be modified regularly from now on.
>
> In hindsight I could have loaded the ASCII release notes into a wiki and
> people could have modified, them, and later I could have converted them
> to SGML, though that would have delayed the release notes being ready
> for a tarball.
Yeah, I don't think that would have been better.
...Robert
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Josh Berkus | 2010-03-22 01:43:53 | Re: 9.0 release notes done |
Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2010-03-22 00:40:38 | Re: proposal: more practical view on function's source code |