Re: Estimation issue with partitioned tables

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Estimation issue with partitioned tables
Date: 2010-03-04 02:07:11
Message-ID: 603c8f071003031807p52f136edh683d19a1d5b46660@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 4:45 PM, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> wrote:
>> I feel like I've seen these way-too-high row estimates in some other
>> postings to -performance, but I'm not sure if it was the same issue.
>> You don't by chance have a RTC? I don't think it's likely fixed in 9.0
>> but it would be interesting to investigate.
>
> Yeah, I can generate one pretty easily; the behavior is readily
> observable and repeatable.  Will get on it RSN, but at you said, we're
> not doing anything about it for 9.0.
>
> I've a feeling that this will become one of the list of issues to be
> fixed with 'real partitioning'.

I can believe it. I can't promise anything, but like I say I'm
willing to take a poke at it if you can provide me a test case.

...Robert

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2010-03-04 22:40:02 Re: partition pruning
Previous Message Josh Berkus 2010-03-03 21:45:53 Re: Estimation issue with partitioned tables