| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Estimation issue with partitioned tables |
| Date: | 2010-03-04 02:07:11 |
| Message-ID: | 603c8f071003031807p52f136edh683d19a1d5b46660@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-performance |
On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 4:45 PM, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> wrote:
>> I feel like I've seen these way-too-high row estimates in some other
>> postings to -performance, but I'm not sure if it was the same issue.
>> You don't by chance have a RTC? I don't think it's likely fixed in 9.0
>> but it would be interesting to investigate.
>
> Yeah, I can generate one pretty easily; the behavior is readily
> observable and repeatable. Will get on it RSN, but at you said, we're
> not doing anything about it for 9.0.
>
> I've a feeling that this will become one of the list of issues to be
> fixed with 'real partitioning'.
I can believe it. I can't promise anything, but like I say I'm
willing to take a poke at it if you can provide me a test case.
...Robert
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2010-03-04 22:40:02 | Re: partition pruning |
| Previous Message | Josh Berkus | 2010-03-03 21:45:53 | Re: Estimation issue with partitioned tables |