Re: No hash join across partitioned tables?

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Kris Jurka <books(at)ejurka(dot)com>, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: No hash join across partitioned tables?
Date: 2010-03-02 16:16:51
Message-ID: 603c8f071003020816j77b3ec63wbad0415df003c0f1@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-performance

On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 7:03 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
>> Did this get addressed?
>
> Partially.  There are stats now but autovacuum is not bright about
> when to update them.

Is that something you're planning to fix for 9.0? If not, we at least
need to document what we intend for people to do about it.

...Robert

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2010-03-02 16:21:28 Re: USE_LIBXSLT in MSVC builds
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2010-03-02 16:00:27 Re: USE_LIBXSLT in MSVC builds

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2010-03-02 16:21:15 Re: GiST index performance
Previous Message Pierre C 2010-03-02 08:36:48 Re: SSD + RAID