From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: explain and PARAM_EXEC |
Date: | 2010-02-20 13:05:34 |
Message-ID: | 603c8f071002200505q3b7ba150v8cf8ccc260d6749f@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 11:58 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>> On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 11:33 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>>> We can also fetch that tuple's
>>> relfilenode and pass it to the subplan, which we do by setting the $0
>>> Param value before invoking the subplan.
>
>> Are the same tuples in scope when evaluating the expression that sets
>> $0 as were in scope when evaluating ((b.oid)::integer + 1)?
>
> Yes, exactly the same. The parameter-value expression is just like any
> other scalar expression that could appear where the SubPlan reference
> is. It doesn't know anything about the subplan, really.
OK, thanks for the explanation. That makes more sense now. I've got
to go study this some more before I ask my next question...
...Robert
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Haas | 2010-02-20 13:10:03 | Re: explain and PARAM_EXEC |
Previous Message | Greg Stark | 2010-02-20 12:53:04 | Re: explain and PARAM_EXEC |