| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>, Greg Stark <stark(at)mit(dot)edu>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, "<pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, twraney(at)comcast(dot)net |
| Subject: | Re: Some belated patch review for "Buffers" explain analyze patch |
| Date: | 2010-02-10 18:57:13 |
| Message-ID: | 603c8f071002101057j7e49df87m355ee1074384ef2a@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 12:08 PM, Alvaro Herrera
<alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> wrote:
> Robert Haas escribió:
>> On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 11:58 AM, Alvaro Herrera
>> <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> wrote:
>
>> > Is Redhat's Visual Explain still alive? And what about Tom Raney's stuff?
>>
>> The core of Tom Raney's work was not so much the EXPLAIN format per se
>> (which is really mooted by the changes already made in CVS) but the
>> ability to get information about plans the planner considered and
>> discarded. I am not sure whether the latter is something we want to
>> accept into core (not for 9.0 at any rate, I would think).
>
> I was thinking in his visual stuff ... didn't he also wrote a tool to
> visualize plans?
Yeah, but again, that was to see all the other things that were
considered at any given node, not just to see the actual plan.
...Robert
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2010-02-10 19:01:57 | Re: [PATCH] Output configuration status after ./configure run. |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2010-02-10 18:56:21 | Re: [CFReview] Red-Black Tree |