| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org, Michael Clemmons <glassresistor(at)gmail(dot)com>, Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Scott Marlowe <scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Re: Faster CREATE DATABASE by delaying fsync (was 8.4.1 ubuntu karmic slow createdb) |
| Date: | 2010-02-02 19:45:46 |
| Message-ID: | 603c8f071002021145x1939c9e7hb2eedc8ae4dfe23e@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-performance |
On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 2:33 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>> Hmm, in that case, I think the problem is that this function has no
>> comment explaining its intended charter.
>
> That's certainly a big problem, but a comment won't fix the fact that
> the name is misleading. We need both a comment and a name change.
I think you're probably right, but it's not clear what the new name
should be until we have a comment explaining what the function is
responsible for.
...Robert
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Teodor Sigaev | 2010-02-02 19:47:17 | Re: [CFReview] Red-Black Tree |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2010-02-02 19:33:30 | Re: [HACKERS] Re: Faster CREATE DATABASE by delaying fsync (was 8.4.1 ubuntu karmic slow createdb) |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2010-02-02 19:58:40 | Re: Re: 回复：Re: [PERFORM] the jokes for pg concurrency write performance |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2010-02-02 19:33:30 | Re: [HACKERS] Re: Faster CREATE DATABASE by delaying fsync (was 8.4.1 ubuntu karmic slow createdb) |