From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Rafael Martinez <r(dot)m(dot)guerrero(at)usit(dot)uio(dot)no>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Clearing global statistics |
Date: | 2010-01-17 00:33:13 |
Message-ID: | 603c8f071001161633m27d80fbdje1c5cf28ae72c855@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 1:11 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
>> Tom Lane wrote:
>>> Actually, that brings up a more general question: what's with the
>>> enthusiasm for clearing statistics *at all*?
>
>> ... Right now, you're still carrying around
>> the history of the bad period forever though, and every check of the
>> pg_stat_bgwriter requires manually subtracting the earlier values out.
>
> Seems like a more appropriate solution would be to make it easier to do
> that subtraction, ie, make it easier to capture the values at a given
> time point and then get deltas from there. It's more general (you could
> have multiple saved sets of values), and doesn't require superuser
> permissions to do, and doesn't have the same potential for
> damn-I-wish-I-hadn't-done-that moments.
True, but it's also more complicated to use. Most systems I'm
familiar with[1] that have performance counters just provide an option
to clear them. Despite the disadvantages you cite, it seems to be
fairly useful in practice; anyway, I have found it so.
...Robert
[1] The other design I've seen is a system that automatically resets,
say, once a day. It retains the statistics for the 24-hour period
between the most recent two resets, and the statistics for the partial
period following the last reset. But that doesn't seem appropriate
for PostgreSQL....
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Hitoshi Harada | 2010-01-17 06:28:45 | Re: review: More frame options in window functions |
Previous Message | Josh Berkus | 2010-01-16 23:53:54 | Re: Streaming replication status |