| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Dimitri Fontaine <dfontaine(at)hi-media(dot)com>, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: damage control mode |
| Date: | 2010-01-10 12:55:09 |
| Message-ID: | 603c8f071001100455o25390b33gd8d60c2f592243a8@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sun, Jan 10, 2010 at 5:31 AM, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> wrote:
>> But really if beta slips because we don't like the looks of our open issues
>> list, thats signicantly better than the last couple releases where we held
>> everything up just to get things into CVS months after feature freeze had
>> passed us by.
>
> It is, unless it's because we created those open items by committing
> things too late in the cycle, even though it wasn't quite ready, "so
> the author won't have to wait another year for a release".
Exactly. Or even - it was ready, but even code that's ready can have
bugs. The more time you give yourself before release, the more likely
you are to find a few of those.
...Robert
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2010-01-10 13:02:21 | Re: damage control mode |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2010-01-10 12:53:35 | Re: damage control mode |