Re: Serializable Isolation without blocking

On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 5:04 PM, Kevin Grittner
<Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov> wrote:
> Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
>> I think you should have users/kgrittner/postgres.git rather than
>> serializable.git.  serializable sounds more like the branch name.
>
> Hmmm....  On a multi-year project it seemed more than remotely
> possible that responsibility for the project could shift, either to
> an external contractor or some other programmer here, so a name
> related to the reason for the repository rather than the current
> lead programmer seemed to make sense.  One wouldn't want the
> repository location shifting based on assignments, I would have
> thought.  But if that's going to throw people, I can easily withdraw
> my original request and resubmit along the lines you mention.  I'll
> wait a bit for other comments before taking any action.

Well the nice thing about git is that there is no reason why you need
to have a single central repository...

...Robert