From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan(at)kaltenbrunner(dot)cc> |
Cc: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: unresolved bugs |
Date: | 2010-01-06 21:30:53 |
Message-ID: | 603c8f071001061330y5b3f918yb718fc638658611b@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 4:10 PM, Stefan Kaltenbrunner
<stefan(at)kaltenbrunner(dot)cc> wrote:
> Robert Haas wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 4:00 PM, Alvaro Herrera
>> <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Robert Haas escribió:
>>>>
>>>> Over the past few months, I've been attempting to keep tracks of which
>>>> postings on pgsql-bugs have not gotten a response and to respond to
>>>> those where I have a clue what the issue might be.
>>>
>>> So you installed the bugzilla module on yourself? Neat. Keep at it!
>>
>> Actually it's Brucezilla.
>
> hmm maybe I should resurrect the bugzilla testbed again :)
If we're going to use a bug-tracker, Bugzilla wouldn't be my first
choice, I don't think. Honestly what I'd like better than a
full-fledged trackers is just a webapp that lists all the unreplied-to
emails in the pgsql-bugs archives. That wouldn't of course tell you
if a bug got a reply that didn't actually resolve the issue, but that
doesn't seem to be very common anyway. Most times if nobody responds
it's because either (1) it's not really a bug (user question, feature
request, etc.) or (2) the person who is qualified to respond doesn't
actually read pgsql-bugs.
...Robert
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Haas | 2010-01-06 21:33:51 | Re: Serializable Isolation without blocking |
Previous Message | Kevin Grittner | 2010-01-06 21:29:55 | Re: Serializable Isolation without blocking |