Re: I: TODO: Allow substring/replace() to get/set bit values

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Leonardo F <m_lists(at)yahoo(dot)it>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: I: TODO: Allow substring/replace() to get/set bit values
Date: 2010-01-06 19:36:41
Message-ID: 603c8f071001061136k3a63d9a6yab9291f70dd38faa@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 1:21 PM, Leonardo F <m_lists(at)yahoo(dot)it> wrote:
>> > To sum up:
>> >
>> > 1) a new function, "get_bit", that calls substring
>> > 2) a new function, "overlay", that replaces bits (starting at a certain
>> position)
>> > 3) a new function, "set_bit", that calls overlay
>>
>> That seems reasonable to me.  Not sure what others think.
>
> Is anybody interested? Otherwise the entry could be removed from the TODO list...

Even if not, you can still submit a patch. There are a lot more users
of PG than there are people who read -hackers.

...Robert

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message John Naylor 2010-01-06 19:41:07 Re: snapshot generation broken again...
Previous Message Robert Haas 2010-01-06 19:34:02 Re: fastgetattr & isNull