| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: pg_migrator issues |
| Date: | 2010-01-05 16:08:01 |
| Message-ID: | 603c8f071001050808g21dc63b0w301436bd8373eb87@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 11:06 AM, Alvaro Herrera
<alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
>> > I liked the idea, but I listed it as item #2 and no one else said they
>> > liked it. The only complexity I can see with the idea is that doing an
>> > upgrade from one alpha to another would have the same major version
>> > number and would therefore not be possible, so maybe we have to use the
>> > catalog version number in there.
>>
>> Good point. Using catversion for the purpose seems a bit ugly but
>> I have no better ideas.
>
> I thought we had rejected the idea of being able to migrate between
> alphas. Is migrating between major versions not difficult enough?
We like a challenge.
...Robert
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2010-01-05 16:10:47 | Re: pg_migrator issues |
| Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2010-01-05 16:06:49 | Re: pg_migrator issues |