Re: patch - per-tablespace random_page_cost/seq_page_cost

On Mon, Jan 4, 2010 at 1:48 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>> My only objection to that is that if we're going to add attoptions
>> also, I'd like to get this committed first before I start working on
>> that, and we're running short on time.  If you can commit his patch in
>> the next day or two, then I am fine with rebasing mine afterwards, but
>> if it needs more work than that then I would prefer to commit mine so
>> I can move on.  Is that reasonable?
>
> Fair enough --- if I can't get it done today I will let you know and
> hold off.

OK, so since you got this done, I'm going to go ahead and rebase &
commit mine today, after a final read-through or two, unless you or
anyone else wants to insert some last-minute objections?

...Robert