Re: Thoughts on statistics for continuously advancing columns

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Chetan Suttraway <chetan(dot)suttraway(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Nathan Boley <npboley(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Thoughts on statistics for continuously advancing columns
Date: 2010-01-05 15:08:20
Message-ID: 603c8f071001050708o44c97e49t19c815d0c88051f2@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 7:49 AM, Chetan Suttraway
<chetan(dot)suttraway(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
> if we can treat this case as similar to that of merging of histograms in
> case of joins involving 2 tables and generating the histograms for the
> cartesian (result) node,

...which you can't, because it's totally different, so I think the
rest of this is a dead end.

...Robert

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2010-01-05 15:14:44 Re: I: TODO: Allow substring/replace() to get/set bit values
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2010-01-05 14:29:54 Re: Streaming replication and postmaster signaling