From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Kevin Grittner <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov> |
Cc: | nicolas(dot)barbier(at)gmail(dot)com, gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, laurenz(dot)albe(at)wien(dot)gv(dot)at |
Subject: | Re: Serializable Isolation without blocking |
Date: | 2010-01-01 01:15:39 |
Message-ID: | 603c8f070912311715m24cb8e59r7e91a74212c853f2@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Dec 31, 2009 at 7:45 PM, Kevin Grittner
<Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov> wrote:
> Robert Haas wrote:
>
>> What predicate locking? If you take ACCESS EXCLUSIVE locks on every
>> read, that should serialize all access to every table. Predicate
>> locking wouldn't do anything, because the table would be completely
>> inaccessible to all competing transactions.
>
> Yeah, that's the benefit of starting with the ACCESS EXCLUSIVE locks,
> but once I've confirmed that I've found all the places to get the
> table level locks, the next step is to turn them into table level
> SIREAD locks, and then to implement the SSI. Locking against
> referenced objects is the only practical technique for implementing
> predicate locking for production environments that I've seen.
>
> The phase where I'm making each referenced table totally inaccessible
> to all competing transaction should be pretty short-lived. It just
> gives me an interim milestone to test that piece in isolation before
> going on to use it; which is great, but not a place to stop for long.
>
> Or have I totally misunderstood your suggestion?
Nope, you're on target. Although - if I were you - I would post the
ACCESS EXCLUSIVE lock version of the patch for feedback. I can't
speak for anyone else, but I'll read it.
(Just clearly label it as what it is, of course.)
...Robert
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jaime Casanova | 2010-01-01 06:55:00 | about some parameters |
Previous Message | Kevin Grittner | 2010-01-01 00:45:37 | Re: Serializable Isolation without blocking |