From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com> |
Cc: | Tim Bunce <Tim(dot)Bunce(at)pobox(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Status of plperl inter-sp calling |
Date: | 2009-12-31 18:14:39 |
Message-ID: | 603c8f070912311014h45589375uf451362b5d40606f@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 7:41 PM, David E. Wheeler <david(at)kineticode(dot)com> wrote:
> On Dec 30, 2009, at 4:17 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
>
>>> That much works currently. Behind the scenes, when a stored procedure is
>>> loaded into plperl the code ref for the perl sub is stored in a cache.
>>> Effectively just
>>> $cache{$name}[$nargs] = $coderef;
>>
>> That doesn't seem like enough to guarantee that you've got the right
>> function. What if you have two functions with the same number of
>> arguments but different argument types? And what about optional
>> arguments, variable arguments, etc.?
>
> As Tim said elsewhere:
>
>> I don't see either of those as significant issues: "If you need more
>> control for a particular SP then don't use SP::* to call that SP."
Sorry, I missed that. I guess it seems weird to me to handle
overloading, but only partially. If we're OK with punting, why not
punt the whole thing and just have $cache{$name} = $coderef?
...Robert
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Kevin Grittner | 2009-12-31 18:43:05 | Re: Serializable Isolation without blocking |
Previous Message | Turner, Ian | 2009-12-31 18:09:40 | Re: Re-enabling SET ROLE in security definer functions |