Re: SE-PgSQL developer documentation (Re: Reworks for Access Control facilities (r2363))

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: KaiGai Kohei <kaigai(at)ak(dot)jp(dot)nec(dot)com>
Cc: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, KaiGai Kohei <kaigai(at)kaigai(dot)gr(dot)jp>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: SE-PgSQL developer documentation (Re: Reworks for Access Control facilities (r2363))
Date: 2009-10-28 03:27:37
Message-ID: 603c8f070910272027l7d13f56cw37f13219041ddcb7@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

2009/10/27 KaiGai Kohei <kaigai(at)ak(dot)jp(dot)nec(dot)com>:
> - no statement support to specify security context.
>  (It makes impossible to add support in pg_dump. Is it really OK?)

I doubt that anything without pg_dump support would be even vaguely OK...

...Robert

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Josh Berkus 2009-10-28 03:35:54 Where's the docs?
Previous Message Robert Haas 2009-10-28 03:24:36 Re: Parsing config files in a directory