Re: some possible parser cleaning: drop support column(table) syntax

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: some possible parser cleaning: drop support column(table) syntax
Date: 2009-10-22 15:01:57
Message-ID: 603c8f070910220801m267a77a5h55cb482f333f429b@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 10:22 AM, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> 2009/10/22 Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>:
>> Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>>> this is syntax column(table) necessary still?
>>
>> There is no reason to remove that.
>>
>
> do you know somebody who use it? It is dead code. Processing of call
> functions should be simpler.

"Dead code" means code that can't actually be reached, not code that
does something you don't like. :-)

...Robert

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Cédric Villemain 2009-10-22 15:03:33 Re: per table random-page-cost?
Previous Message Cédric Villemain 2009-10-22 15:01:20 Re: per table random-page-cost?