Re: CommitFest 2009-09, two weeks on

2009/10/14 KaiGai Kohei <kaigai(at)ak(dot)jp(dot)nec(dot)com>:
> Robert Haas wrote:
>> On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 12:24 PM, Heikki Linnakangas
>> <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
>>>>  Do you
>>>> have any sense of how soon you'll feel confident to commit either
>>>> patch?
>>> I'm bad at estimating. Not this week for sure, and next week I'm
>>> traveling and won't be able to spend as much time on it as I am right
>>> now. If no new major issues are found, and all the outstanding issues
>>> are resolved by me or Simon by then, maybe the week after that.
>>
>> It's now the week after that, so unless you're in the process of
>> typing that 'cvs commit' command, I'm going to move HS + SR out to the
>> next CommitFest so that we can close this one out and stamp alpha2.
>>
>> <brief pause for objections will now ensue>
>
> I have a question.
> When we register the postponed patches on the CF-Nov site again,
> which tag should be choosen? "Needs Review"? or "Ready for Commiter"?

Needs Review.

...Robert