| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Marko Kreen <markokr(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Albe Laurenz <laurenz(dot)albe(at)wien(dot)gv(dot)at>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, mlortiz <mlortiz(at)uci(dot)cu>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Rejecting weak passwords |
| Date: | 2009-09-28 18:40:15 |
| Message-ID: | 603c8f070909281140h31d2150dtd14b00b49b101c59@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 2:00 PM, Marko Kreen <markokr(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> So promoting the ENCRYPTED 'foo' as "secure" may lure users into
> false sense of security, and be lax against sniffing and logfile
> protection.
ENCRYPTED prevents the user's password from being stolen by a modified server.
...Robert
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Pavel Stehule | 2009-09-28 19:16:12 | Re: patch: Review handling of MOVE and FETCH (ToDo) |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2009-09-28 18:37:11 | Re: Rejecting weak passwords |