| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Jaime Casanova <jcasanov(at)systemguards(dot)com(dot)ec> |
| Cc: | KaiGai Kohei <kaigai(at)kaigai(dot)gr(dot)jp>, KaiGai Kohei <kaigai(at)ak(dot)jp(dot)nec(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] Largeobject access controls |
| Date: | 2009-09-22 17:53:22 |
| Message-ID: | 603c8f070909221053q7cabd1c2tb462aabee40eb705@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 1:29 PM, Jaime Casanova
<jcasanov(at)systemguards(dot)com(dot)ec> wrote:
> have anyone better ideas about the name? if not, then go with
> pg_largeobject_meta
I don't think there's anything wrong with calling it metadata. That
seems to leave the door open to future things we might want to do,
without restricting it to security-related settings or whatever. But
I don't see any reason to abbreviate it either - I'd go with
pg_largeobject_metadata rather than just pg_largeobject_meta.
...Robert
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | David Fetter | 2009-09-22 17:56:32 | Re: Anonymous code blocks vs CREATE LANGUAGE |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2009-09-22 17:50:45 | Re: Anonymous code blocks vs CREATE LANGUAGE |