Re: WIP: generalized index constraints

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>
Cc: Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>, Brendan Jurd <direvus(at)gmail(dot)com>, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: WIP: generalized index constraints
Date: 2009-09-15 19:04:50
Message-ID: 603c8f070909151204h1d6af94fn9a2d1cfc475f583@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 3:03 PM, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> wrote:
> * "operator-based constraints"
>    A little math-ier, but talks about the API rather than details of
>    the server implementation.

Or operator-exclusion constraints? Operator-based exclusion constraints?

I'm feeling exclusive.

...Robert

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jeff Davis 2009-09-15 19:05:11 dropping partitions and concurrent reads
Previous Message David Fetter 2009-09-15 19:03:16 Re: WIP: generalized index constraints