From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
Cc: | Itagaki Takahiro <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)oss(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, KaiGai Kohei <kaigai(at)ak(dot)jp(dot)nec(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Triggers on columns |
Date: | 2009-09-03 18:19:57 |
Message-ID: | 603c8f070909031119m7a8819cco953241b9b92f2ce7@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 2:16 PM, Peter Eisentraut<peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> wrote:
> On tor, 2009-09-03 at 11:19 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
>> Sure, but I don't think it makes a lot of sense to spend a lot of time
>> implementing the standard behavior unless someone can provide a
>> plausible use case.
>
> One use case is porting Oracle applications. I see a lot of that used
> there. The original proposer might had have other ideas.
Perhaps so, but his second post to the thread suggests that he didn't
have the interpretation you're proposing in mind.
...Robert
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Simon Riggs | 2009-09-03 18:22:45 | Hot Standby, max_connections and max_prepared_transactions |
Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2009-09-03 18:16:35 | Re: Triggers on columns |