Re: Triggers on columns

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: Itagaki Takahiro <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)oss(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, KaiGai Kohei <kaigai(at)ak(dot)jp(dot)nec(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Triggers on columns
Date: 2009-09-03 18:19:57
Message-ID: 603c8f070909031119m7a8819cco953241b9b92f2ce7@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 2:16 PM, Peter Eisentraut<peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> wrote:
> On tor, 2009-09-03 at 11:19 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
>> Sure, but I don't think it makes a lot of sense to spend a lot of time
>> implementing the standard behavior unless someone can provide a
>> plausible use case.
>
> One use case is porting Oracle applications.  I see a lot of that used
> there.  The original proposer might had have other ideas.

Perhaps so, but his second post to the thread suggests that he didn't
have the interpretation you're proposing in mind.

...Robert

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Simon Riggs 2009-09-03 18:22:45 Hot Standby, max_connections and max_prepared_transactions
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2009-09-03 18:16:35 Re: Triggers on columns