From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
Cc: | Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Archive Message-Id links broken? |
Date: | 2009-08-31 17:12:04 |
Message-ID: | 603c8f070908311012r5cfd866esb952c2aa9db527a4@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-www |
On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 10:24 AM, Alvaro
Herrera<alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> wrote:
> Robert Haas escribió:
>> On Sun, Aug 30, 2009 at 10:47 PM, Alvaro
>> Herrera<alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> wrote:
>
>> > This is all crap of course, which is why we want to replace Mhonarc with
>> > a database-backed system.
>>
>> Database? You mean like Excel?
>
> Huh. You know, Mhonarc has something that it calls "database" which is
> actually a bunch of Perl files with a dump of internal variables
> describing the mailbox. The fact that it has to read and keep in memory
> all those files is the reason it doesn't scale well past a month's worth
> of email. Perhaps it could cope with a year, provided you have a lot of
> RAM; but clearly it won't work well if we want to handle our complete
> archive.
Go ahead, ignore my witty (?) remark and come back with a serious response.
There seems to be a whole lot of project infrastructure that is a bit
long in the tooth. Of course, it's hard to get up the enthusiasm to
address the problems since it all basically works, so the
effort/reward ratio is a bit on the low side.
...Robert
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Haas | 2009-08-31 17:12:47 | Re: Archive Message-Id links broken? |
Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2009-08-31 14:26:43 | Re: Archive Message-Id links broken? |