From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Saneera Gunasekara <saneera(at)apturion(dot)com> |
Cc: | security(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Stalled post to pgsql-bugs |
Date: | 2009-08-14 17:01:30 |
Message-ID: | 603c8f070908141001r630de9f2x6ba6d0312c8e9359@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 1:35 AM, Saneera Gunasekara<saneera(at)apturion(dot)com> wrote:
>
> Dear Sir
>
> I have got the following error message when connecting postgres from
> postgres admin connecting form the localhost
> (only special thing in machine configuration is attached the 2 network cards
> to the installation machine)
>
> could not connect to server: Connection refused (0x0000274D/10061)
> Is the server running on host "127.0.0.1" and
>
> accepting TCP/IP connections on port 5432?
>
> If you encounter this message, please check if the server you're trying to
> contact is
>
> actually running PostgreSQL on the given port.
>
> Test if you have network connectivity from your client to the server host
> using ping or
>
> equivalent tools. Is your network / VPN / SSH tunnel / firewall configured
> correctly?
>
> You probably have some low level network connectivity problems (e.g.
> firewall
>
> please let me how to resolve this problem permanently we have got this error
> message time by time but not always run the postgresSQL service using the
> .\postgres account when start up the
> machine
Maybe you should follow the directions given in the error message.
They are fairly detailed. If you can't figure it out, you could ask
for help on pgsql-general or pgsql-novice, but you're going to need to
provide a lot more information about what you tried and what happened.
In any event, this is neither a bug nor a security issue, so I don't
think you should be sending it to these lists.
...Robert
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Sam's Lists | 2009-08-15 05:13:34 | What happened with bug #2527? |
Previous Message | Carlos Alonso (ICtel Ingenieros) | 2009-08-14 08:20:37 | Re: BUG #4962: Pre-existing shared memory block is still in use |