Re: machine-readable explain output v4

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Mike <ipso(at)snappymail(dot)ca>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: machine-readable explain output v4
Date: 2009-08-11 21:38:33
Message-ID: 603c8f070908111438x2d801be1t8056256feda7285b@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 3:59 PM, Andrew Dunstan<andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> wrote:
> Good. I had a look at this for a little while yesterday. I built it, did an
> install, loaded auto_explain and then ran the regression tests. I didn't
> like the output much. It looks like the XML has been dumbed down to fit a
> data model that works for JSON as well, particularly in the lack of use of
> attributes. An XML processor won't care that much, but humans will certainly
> find it more tiresome to read. In effect we are swapping horizontal
> expansion for vertical expansion. It would be nicer to be able to fit a plan
> into a screen.

Isn't that what text format is for?

Not that the XML format is perfect; I haven't heard one person say
that they like anything about it except that it is already
implemented.

...Robert

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dimitri Fontaine 2009-08-11 21:40:25 Re: Hot standby and synchronous replication status
Previous Message Robert Haas 2009-08-11 21:32:01 Re: Any tutorial or FAQ on building an extension?