From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Teodor Sigaev <teodor(at)sigaev(dot)ru> |
Cc: | Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>, Oleg Bartunov <oleg(at)sai(dot)msu(dot)su>, Pgsql Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Prefix support for synonym dictionary |
Date: | 2009-08-06 16:19:51 |
Message-ID: | 603c8f070908060919o5151741aq3af69fff573ea83e@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
2009/8/6 Teodor Sigaev <teodor(at)sigaev(dot)ru>:
>> 1. The docs should be clarified a little. For instance, it should have a
>> link back to the definition of a prefix search (12.3.2). I included my
>> doc suggestions as an attachment.
>
> Thank you, merged
>
>> 2. dsynonym_init() uses findwrd() in a slightly confusing (and perhaps
>> fragile) way. After calling findwrd(), the "end" pointer is pointing at
>> either the end of the string, or the *; depending on whether the string
>> ends in * and whether flags is NULL. I only mention this because I had
>> to take a more careful look to see what was happening. Perhaps add a
>> comment to make it more clear?
>
> Add comments:
> /*
> * Finds the next whitespace-delimited word within the 'in' string.
> * Returns a pointer to the first character of the word, and a pointer
> * to the next byte after the last character in the word (in *end).
> * Character '*' at the end of word will not be threated as word
> * charater if flags is not null.
> */
> static char *
> findwrd(char *in, char **end, uint16 *flags)
>
>
>
>> 3. The patch looks for the special byte '*'. I think that's fine,
>> because we depend on the files being in UTF-8 encoding, where it's the
>> same byte. However, I thought it was worth mentioning in case we want to
>> support other encodings for text search files later.
>
> tsearch_readline() converts file's UTF8 encoding into server encoding. pgsql
> supports only encoding which are a superset of ASCII. So it's safe to use
> asterisk with any encodings
Jeff,
Based on these comments, do you want to go ahead and mark this "Ready
for Committer"?
https://commitfest.postgresql.org/action/patch_view?id=133
...Robert
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2009-08-06 16:28:15 | Re: dblink bulk operations |
Previous Message | Teodor Sigaev | 2009-08-06 15:58:49 | Re: Prefix support for synonym dictionary |