Re: pg_proc.probin should become text?

On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 10:40 PM, Tom Lane<tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>> On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 10:03 PM, Tom Lane<tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>>> I think that the least painful solution might be to change
>>> pg_proc.probin to be declared as text.  Otherwise we're going to need
>>> version-specific klugery in pg_dump and who knows where else.
>
>> Will that require a special hack in pg_migrator?
>
> No, pg_dump (and hence pg_migrator) wouldn't care.
>
> If we thought we were going to try to back-patch a fix for the
> non-ASCII-char problem into older releases, then some other approach
> would be preferable.  But given the fact that this hasn't gotten
> complained of (at least not enough to be identified) in all the years
> since Berkeley, I can't see doing the pushups that would be needed to
> back-patch a fix.  It looks to me like everyone has been effectively
> assuming that probin stores text, and we should just make it really
> truly do that.

Sounds good to me, then.

...Robert