Re: Proposal: More portable way to support 64bit platforms

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Tsutomu Yamada <tsutomu(at)sraoss(dot)co(dot)jp>
Subject: Re: Proposal: More portable way to support 64bit platforms
Date: 2009-07-29 21:25:28
Message-ID: 603c8f070907291425l2685134cg93921e8a1ce10356@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 4:24 PM, Peter Eisentraut<peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> wrote:
> On Friday 26 June 2009 12:07:24 Tsutomu Yamada wrote:
>> Included is a conceptual patch to use intptr_t. Comments are welcome.
>
> After closer inspection, not having a win64 box available, I have my doubts
> whether this patch actually does anything.  Foremost, it doesn't touch the
> definition of the Datum type, which ought to be at the core of a change like
> this.
>
> Now I see that you call this a "conceptual patch".  Perhaps we should wait
> until you have developed it into a complete patch?

Is there any reason to consider this patch any further during this
CommitFest? It seems that this is a long way from being ready to go.

...Robert

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Josh Williams 2009-07-29 21:31:53 Re: multi-threaded pgbench
Previous Message Robert Haas 2009-07-29 21:22:54 Re: WIP patch for TODO Item: Add prompt escape to display the client and server versions