From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Pavan Deolasee <pavan(dot)deolasee(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Alex Hunsaker <badalex(at)gmail(dot)com>, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: visibility maps and heap_prune |
Date: | 2009-07-25 21:51:12 |
Message-ID: | 603c8f070907251451l4d839bbfq68da642f366564eb@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 2:37 AM, Pavan Deolasee<pavan(dot)deolasee(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 10:38 AM, Robert Haas<robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> Pavan, are you planning to respond to Alex's comments and/or update this patch?
>
> Yes, I will. Hopefully by end of this week.
Since it has now been 10 days since this patch was reviewed, I think
that it is more than fair to move this from "Waiting on Author" to
"Returned with Feedback". As I've said on other threads, we want to
give everyone a fair chance to respond to review comments, but we also
don't want to tie up reviewers indefinitely on patches that aren't
being updated in a timely fashion, and we don't want to be left with a
crush of patches that need to be re-reviewed at the very end of the
CommitFest when suddenly everyone updates them. So I'm going to go
make this change.
I hope, though, that this will be resubmitted, after appropriate
updating, for a future CommitFest. I haven't read the code so I can't
speak at all to whether it works (in which I'm including crash-safe,
deadlock-proof, and correct with respect to locking), but if so it
sounds like a nice improvement.
Thanks,
...Robert
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Greg Stark | 2009-07-25 21:57:37 | Re: autogenerating headers & bki stuff |
Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2009-07-25 21:42:18 | Re: Non-blocking communication between a frontend and a backend (pqcomm) |