From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: explain refactoring v4 |
Date: | 2009-07-24 21:15:14 |
Message-ID: | 603c8f070907241415q750dd025u6fcdb5994b0be90@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 5:11 PM, Tom Lane<tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>> OK, here it is again. Changes are the same as the previous version,
>> but this one should apply cleanly after today's pgindent run.
>
> Applied with some minor editorialization/further cleanup.
Thanks. I mostly finished the rework of the generic options patch
last night, but I was so sleepy that I couldn't stay up long enough to
fully test it. I'll try to get that out tonight, or at the latest
tomorrow. Hopefully your minor editorialization and further cleanup
won't create too many merge conflicts.
> I left the "Subquery Scan on ss" business as-is. If anyone complains
> it would be an easy thing to suppress the "on", but it'd be ugly, and
> I'm not convinced anyone will care. It's not like it's the first time
> we ever changed the output of EXPLAIN ...
Fine with me either way.
...Robert
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Merlin Moncure | 2009-07-24 21:18:28 | Re: When is a record NULL? |
Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2009-07-24 21:11:51 | Re: explain refactoring v4 |