| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Synch Rep for CommitFest 2009-07 |
| Date: | 2009-07-15 11:15:28 |
| Message-ID: | 603c8f070907150415v46a0afc3l53ed6a166fbabc1d@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 12:32 AM, Fujii Masao<masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> If the above is OK, should I update the patch ASAP? or
> suspend that update until many other comments arrive?
> I'm concerned that frequent small updating interferes with
> a review.
I decided (perhaps foolishly), to assign reviewers for the two smaller
patches that you extracted from this first, and to hold off on
assigning a reviewer for the main patch until those reviews were
completed:
http://archives.postgresql.org/message-id/3f0b79eb0907022341m1d36a841x19c3e2a5a6906b5b@mail.gmail.com
http://archives.postgresql.org/message-id/3f0b79eb0907030037g515f3337o9092279c62348dc@mail.gmail.com
So I think you should update ASAP in this case. As soon as we get
some reviewers freed up from the initial reviewing round, I will
assign one or more reviewers to the main Sync Rep patch.
...Robert
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2009-07-15 11:19:33 | Re: Filtering dictionaries support and unaccent dictionary |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2009-07-15 11:06:45 | Re: CommitFest 2009-07 is Now Closed |