Re: [PATCH] SE-PostgreSQL Updates rev.2096

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: KaiGai Kohei <kaigai(at)kaigai(dot)gr(dot)jp>
Cc: KaiGai Kohei <kaigai(at)ak(dot)jp(dot)nec(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] SE-PostgreSQL Updates rev.2096
Date: 2009-07-03 05:07:46
Message-ID: 603c8f070907022207k6ad9ecc7gccdfbfbdb07bdfb0@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 10:45 PM, KaiGai Kohei<kaigai(at)kaigai(dot)gr(dot)jp> wrote:
> Right now, I think it is preferable to focus on the first three patches
> at the first commit fest.
>
> What's your opinion?

If the first three patches are the least amount of code that makes a
complete feature, then that's the right way to go. Please remove
everything from those patches that isn't part of the basic feature set
(e.g. row-level security) and repost the updated versions of just
those patches, so that it is clear which code we are reviewing. Maybe
call it SE-pgsql lite, or whatever.

Thanks,

...Robert

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Fujii Masao 2009-07-03 05:13:56 Re: Synch Rep: direct transfer of WAL file from the primary to the standby
Previous Message Robert Haas 2009-07-03 05:01:40 Re: Synch Rep: direct transfer of WAL file from the primary to the standby