Re: Synch Rep: direct transfer of WAL file from the primary to the standby

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Synch Rep: direct transfer of WAL file from the primary to the standby
Date: 2009-07-03 02:07:24
Message-ID: 603c8f070907021907s3f6ac4d2qd41ca425025b69f2@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 10:02 PM, Robert Haas<robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Second, I am wondering whether Heikki feels that it would be useful to
> assign round-robin reviewers for this patch, or whether he's going to
> be the principal reviewer himself.  We could assign either a reviewer
> (or reviewers) to the whole patch, or we could assign reviewers to
> particular chunks of the patch, such as the signal handling piece.

Hmm, taking a look at the wiki, I see that Simon's name is listed for
this patch as a reviewer already. Assuming that's a point of view
that Simon agrees with and not the result of his name having been
added by someone else, I guess the question is whether we need
additional reviewers here beyond Heikki and Simon.

...Robert

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2009-07-03 02:16:41 Re: First CommitFest: July 15th
Previous Message Robert Haas 2009-07-03 02:02:30 Re: Synch Rep: direct transfer of WAL file from the primary to the standby