From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Synch Rep: direct transfer of WAL file from the primary to the standby |
Date: | 2009-07-03 02:07:24 |
Message-ID: | 603c8f070907021907s3f6ac4d2qd41ca425025b69f2@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 10:02 PM, Robert Haas<robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Second, I am wondering whether Heikki feels that it would be useful to
> assign round-robin reviewers for this patch, or whether he's going to
> be the principal reviewer himself. We could assign either a reviewer
> (or reviewers) to the whole patch, or we could assign reviewers to
> particular chunks of the patch, such as the signal handling piece.
Hmm, taking a look at the wiki, I see that Simon's name is listed for
this patch as a reviewer already. Assuming that's a point of view
that Simon agrees with and not the result of his name having been
added by someone else, I guess the question is whether we need
additional reviewers here beyond Heikki and Simon.
...Robert
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Haas | 2009-07-03 02:16:41 | Re: First CommitFest: July 15th |
Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2009-07-03 02:02:30 | Re: Synch Rep: direct transfer of WAL file from the primary to the standby |