From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu> |
Cc: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Jeremy Kerr <jk(at)ozlabs(dot)org>, "<pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan(at)kaltenbrunner(dot)cc>, Gurjeet Singh <singh(dot)gurjeet(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: [PATCH] backend: compare word-at-a-time in bcTruelen |
Date: | 2009-06-16 13:04:39 |
Message-ID: | 603c8f070906160604u3b9d6102y4b952c9e47926fef@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 8:38 AM, Greg Stark<gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu> wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 1:03 PM, Robert Haas<robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> I see that... but I don't think the test in the first loop is correct.
>> It's based on the value of i % 4, but I'm not convinced that you know
>> anything about the alignment at the point where i == 0.
>
> That's correct. To check the alignment you would have to look at the
> actual pointer. I would suggest using the existing macros to handle
> alignment. Hm, though the only one I see offhand which is relevant is
> the moderately silly PointerIsAligned(). Still it would make the code
> clearer even if it's pretty simple.
>
> Incidentally, the char foo[4] = {' ',' ',' ',' '} suggestion is, I
> think, bogus. There would be no alignment guarantee on that array.
> Personally I'm find with 0x20202020 with a comment explaining what it
> is.
Ooh, good point. I still don't like the 0x20 thing, but using uint32
instead of int or long is the main point, unless we support any
platforms where 0x20 != ' '.
...Robert
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2009-06-16 13:09:46 | Re: [PATCH] backend: compare word-at-a-time in bcTruelen |
Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2009-06-16 12:53:28 | Re: machine-readable explain output |