| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: It's June 1; do you know where your release is? |
| Date: | 2009-06-01 19:44:46 |
| Message-ID: | 603c8f070906011244j56bce67bofdec45e6087c5803@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Jun 1, 2009 at 2:09 PM, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> wrote:
> Tom,
>
> Let me start this out by voting the things I think we can drop until 8.5:
>
> * gettext plurals patch needs some polishing
> -- revert patch, save for 8.5
>
> # adjust information_schema precision and scale fields?
> -- save for 8.5
>
> # instrument the Windows shared memory reattachment problem?
> -- as much as I'd like to do this, the solution could be as bad as the
> problem; we'd need more testing time for new instrumentation. Will have to
> deal with via testing patched versions.
>
> # tweak the ordering heuristics for parallel pg_restore?
> -- beta2 version is "good enough"; further improvements should be saved for
> 8.5.
>
> # change or at least redocument from_collapse_limit?
> -- should be doc patch only. Robert Haas should write it.
>
> # revisit increase of default_statistics_target?
> -- No. Still appears to be artifact of DBT2. Can't reproduce the issue
> using pgbench, or any other test. Still investigating.
>
>
> Other questions:
>
> # cost_nestloop and cost_hashjoin are broken for SEMI and ANTI joins
>
> * tgl says: I think this is mostly dealt with but it could use
> performance testing.
>
> Mark? Jignesh? Can you test this?
+1 to all of these. Will send extremely short doc patch tonight. I
recommend we create
http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/PostgreSQL_8.5_Open_Items and start
bumping things that can't be completed for 8.4.
Basically, my opinion is that if it's not a regression, it's too late
to work on it now. We should ship the release when we're confident
that the new features have had adequate testing and we've squashed all
the regressions.
...Robert
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2009-06-01 19:44:51 | Re: It's June 1; do you know where your release is? |
| Previous Message | Selena Deckelmann | 2009-06-01 19:34:51 | Re: from_collapse_limit vs. geqo_threshold |