Re: idea: global temp tables

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: idea: global temp tables
Date: 2009-05-01 13:49:28
Message-ID: 603c8f070905010649i2eb1464aq5f6ab3804dc72f66@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 8:36 AM, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> wrote:
> The archives for this thread
>
> http://archives.postgresql.org//pgsql-hackers/2009-04/threads.php#01329
>
> show a bunch of missing messages.  Were they being stored in a temporary
> table?
>
> Anywhere, here is what I had meant to say but only got through to a few ...

I am getting a lot of messages from this list out of order the last
few days. I'll get later messages in a thread and then a day or two
later I'll get the messages to which they were replies.

...Robert

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2009-05-01 13:56:14 Re: User documentation on signal handling
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2009-05-01 13:03:26 Re: plpgsql's EXIT versus block and loop nesting