Re: Closing some 8.4 open items

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
Cc: David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Grzegorz Jaskiewicz <gj(at)pointblue(dot)com(dot)pl>, Hitoshi Harada <umi(dot)tanuki(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andrew Gierth <andrew(at)tao11(dot)riddles(dot)org(dot)uk>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Closing some 8.4 open items
Date: 2009-04-11 19:52:20
Message-ID: 603c8f070904111252m1a6182abrd09e525a57b7a893@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sat, Apr 11, 2009 at 2:47 PM, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> wrote:
> All,
>
> Having an extra column in \df for "Windowing" was rejected out of hand.
>  Why?

I have no idea. I suggested it and the only one I remember speaking
against it was Tom.

> \df  (let alone \df+) already displays too many wide columns to fit in any
> standard terminal window.  You're pretty much forced to use \x regardless.
>  What's one more column?
>
> And has it occurred to anyone that a pg_functions view is *way* overdue?

For what purpose?

...Robert

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David Fetter 2009-04-11 20:23:19 Re: Closing some 8.4 open items
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2009-04-11 19:34:31 Re: Closing some 8.4 open items